Humanities Writing Competition
2025-26 Competition
Our annual competition is now LIVE!
This is an opportunity for students in Year 12 or equivalent to research and write beyond the curriculum, using one or more of five selected objects from the Lawrence Room museum objects, as their focus. Essays or creative responses (such as dramatic monologues, short stories or poems) are equally welcome. For further information, please read the Competition Rules below and the Information for Entrants.
The objects in the Lawrence Room that have been chosen as starting points for this year’s competition are:
- a Leigong figurine from late nineteenth or early twentieth century China, a deity known as the "Thunder God";
- an eye idol, discovered by Agatha Christie's husband Max Mallowan in Tell Brak;
- an apis bull figure dating from BC 664-525, of Egypt;
- a wooden seated man, from the late Old Kingdom to the late Middle Kingdom periods of ancient Egypt;
- bronze casket fittings, in the shape of lion heads, discovered in the Roman and early medieval cemetery at Girton College.
Girton is grateful to Cambridge University Press and The C. Anne Wilson Fund for kind sponsorship of the competition.
Entries must attach a validated Cover Sheet to the essay/creative response and upload to the Submission Form by Friday 20 March 2026.
Competition Rules
Entries that do not follow the rules will not be considered.
- Submissions must relate to one or more of the following Lawrence Room Objects.
- LR 1110: Leigong figurine
- LR 1060: Eye idol
- LR 427: Apis Bull figurine
- LR 450: Egyptian wooden funerary statue: seated man
- LR 822A-C: Roman bronze casket fittings
- Submissions must be the entrant’s own work. Artificial intelligence must not be used. Any material taken directly from published or online sources must be properly referenced.
- The word limit is 1800 words, including footnotes, but excluding the list of references. Creative writing in particular may be shorter. A word count must be included. Overlength submissions will not be considered.
- There is a limit of 3 entries per school. If we receive more than 3 entries from the same school, the decision will be taken to admit the first 3 entries and not consider any more. Monitoring will be taking place and schools who reach this limit or get close will be informed as a priority.
- Submissions should be typed in English in a standard font, lines 1.5 spaced, and every page should be marked with the entrant’s name.
- Submissions are made on a digital form found here: https://cambridge.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bauor0inizgSaHk.
- Submissions made by email or post will not be considered.
- Submissions accompanied by incomplete cover sheets will not be considered. Please check your submission carefully before sending. Cover sheets that have not been authenticated by the school will not be considered.
- Submissions received after the deadline (5pm, 20 March 2026) will not be considered.
- Entrants must be resident in the UK at the time of the award ceremony, on Thursday 7 May 2026.
- Entrants must be in Year 12 or equivalent (Y13 NI / S5 Scotland).
- Every entrant will receive a certificate of participation.
- Feedback on individual essays will not be provided except for prize winners.
- The judges reserve the right not to award prizes if there is no entry of sufficient merit.
2024-25 Winners
'Exploring the differences in gender roles and relationship dynamics of Bes, Tudigong and their female counterparts’
This brilliantly original essay ingeniously connected two artefacts from very different times and places to illustrate the contrasting place of gender in the worldviews of ancient Egyptian religion and Chinese Confucian philosophy. Widely researched and very maturely and professionally written.
‘Ode on a Cinerary Urn’
This poem was an exceptionally mature, bold and ambitious piece which impressively connected historical and literary knowledge. It referred to Keats’s ‘Ode on a Grecian Urn’ in subject-matter and formal construction while using highly individual, dense, knotty metaphors and phrasing: a beautiful commemoration of the object.
N Minhas - ‘Dual Tanagramania’
Narayan’s essay counterpointed a study of the original purpose of Tanagra figurines with their rediscovery in Victorian times, with well chosen literary and artistic examples illustrating how and why they spoke to that moment in English and American history. Wide-ranging research was combined with lively presentation.
L Wilmouth - ‘The Tactile Power of the Small: An Analysis of Three Sacred Objects’
This essay connected the Egyptian amulets and the Tudigong figurine by focusing on the appeal of small intimate ritual objects compared to large imposing ones – the subversive power of the hidden and the intimacy of touch. The author showed impressive knowledge in drawing on a wide range of comparative examples from different religions and historical periods.
G Wardlaw - 'Buried Voices'
This entry was a beautifully achieved poem on the cinerary urn, one of two on the winning roster. One judge wrote that it conveys ‘a sense of somebody who reads poetry and knows the dynamics of line and stanza’, and: ‘This poem isn’t wearing research on its sleeve, but is an act of research in itself’.
F Harrison - 'On Seeing the Cinerary Urn in the Lawrence Room'
Flora’s essay was a reflection on the mixed funerary practices of the Girton cemetery in the light of her own experience of her grandfather’s funeral and handling the container of his ashes. It melded scholarship and autobiography in a very accomplished and moving way.
